Growth Playbook
Sign in
Back to gallery

Veritasium

Subscribers

20.7M

Videos

501

§01

Phase navigator

1–50 / 501
Phase 1 of 11
Currently viewing
Aug 2010 → Aug 201150 videos analyzed
01
Foundational Science Debunking
Videos 1–50 of 501
StartPhase 6Phase 11
Account created · Jul 2010
1 / 11
Sign in to unlock phase 2

§02

The storyline

This phase, spanning from August 2010 to August 2011, established Veritasium's core identity around science education, particularly by addressing common misconceptions. Early videos like "How long does it take for the earth to go around the sun?" and "What causes the seasons?" directly challenged popular but incorrect scientific beliefs. The channel then delved into fundamental physics and chemistry concepts, with a strong emphasis on atomic theory, as seen in "Atomic Theory" and "Thomson's Plum Pudding Model of the Atom." A significant portion of the content focused on gravity and forces, including titles like "The Difference Between Mass and Weight" and "Misconceptions About Falling Objects." The format frequently involved direct address to the camera, street interviews to gauge public understanding, and simple, illustrative experiments. The median video duration was 177 seconds, indicating a preference for concise explanations.

§03

What landed

The hits, in context
6 of 50 videos · ≥ 3× the typical view count

A typical video here pulls in around 511k views. 6 of them blew past that. The biggest, 6× higher than the rest.

01

Supercooled Water - Explained!

3,121,111 views·Mar 2011

+510%

vs. median

The hook

Many videos on YouTube show water freezing almost instantaneously. This video shows you how to replicate the experiment and it explains how the phenomenon works.

The thumbnail

The thumbnail shows two hands holding a plastic bottle of what appears to be supercooled water, with a blurry background.

Why it broke

This video broke out by offering both a demonstration and an explanation of a visually captivating and widely shared phenomenon (instant freezing water). The hook immediately promises both replication instructions and scientific understanding, while the thumbnail visually cues the experiment, making it highly engaging for an audience interested in science experiments and debunking viral content.

02

Can You Solve This Shadow Illusion?

2,500,398 views·Jun 2011

+389%

vs. median

The hook

When sunlight shines through a small hole, it casts a circular image on the wall regardless of the shape of the hole. The size of the hole also doesn't affect the size of the image.

The thumbnail

The thumbnail features a hand holding a white card with a triangular cutout, casting a shadow with a circular light projection, against a textured wall.

Why it broke

This video's success stemmed from presenting a counterintuitive visual illusion that challenges common assumptions about light and shadows. The hook directly poses a puzzle, immediately drawing the viewer in, and the thumbnail clearly illustrates the perplexing scenario, inviting curiosity and a desire for explanation. This combination of a compelling mystery and a simple, replicable experiment resonated strongly.

03

How Far Away is the Moon? (The Scale of the Universe)

2,402,357 views·Feb 2011

+370%

vs. median

The hook

If the Earth were the size of a basketball and the moon a tennis ball, how far apart would they be?

The thumbnail

The thumbnail displays a moon and a sun icon with text overlays "1 Second" and "8 minutes" respectively, against a black background.

Why it broke

This video captured significant attention by tackling a fundamental concept (the scale of the solar system) that is often misrepresented. The hook uses a relatable analogy to immediately highlight a common misconception, making the abstract concept tangible. The thumbnail, while simple, hints at astronomical distances and time, aligning with the video's theme of scale and challenging perceptions.

04

Misconceptions About Falling Objects

2,238,030 views·Mar 2011

+338%

vs. median

05

How Does The Earth Spin?

2,075,806 views·Jul 2011

+306%

vs. median

06

Fire Syringe

1,989,279 views·Jul 2011

+289%

vs. median

What they have in common

3 patterns identified
01

Videos that directly address and debunk a widespread scientific misconception, often involving a visual demonstration or experiment, performed exceptionally well.

3 examples

02

Videos explaining fundamental, often misunderstood, astronomical or physical phenomena, particularly those related to Earth and its properties, garnered high views.

3 examples

03

Videos featuring engaging, hands-on experiments with clear explanations of the underlying science were strong performers.

3 examples

§04

Rhythm

50 uploads · Aug 2010 → Aug 2011
How often they posted

They uploaded about once a week, with one big break of about 5 months in the middle.

Taller bars = more uploads in that window. Gaps are silence.
Aug 2010each column ≈ 7 daysAug 2011
About once a week

A steady weekly drumbeat with the occasional double-drop.

~7 days between uploads
About 5 months of silence

At one point the channel went quiet for about 5 months, the longest pause in this stretch. Then it came back.

144 days, no uploads
February 2011

Their busiest month: more uploads landed in February 2011 than any other.

peak month

§05

Length & format

50 videos
How long they ran

Most videos run between a quick 2-minute watch and a meatier 4-minute session, landing around the 3-minute mark.

Shorts vs full videos50 total
4
Shorts (under a minute)
46
Full videos (longer watches)
How long they actually areshortest → longest
2m 57stypical length
2m4m6m8m
shortest24s
longest8m 4s

Each dot is one video. Most cluster in the orange band, between a 2-minute watch and a 4-minute session. The longest stretched all the way to 8m 4s.

§06

Top tags

#science literacy23#gravity13#experiments12#gravitational force11#acceleration10#veritasium9#inertia7#bungy jump7#free fall7#bridge bungy7

§07

How they title things

50 titles read
The voice in the headlines

Their titles are medium-length (a quick sentence), and they really like to ask a question.

?
About a third of titles ask a question
42%of titles
How long does it take for the earth to go around the sun?
What causes the seasons?
Just a few titles end with “!”
6%
None of titles use an emoji
0%
None of titles shout in ALL CAPS
0%
None of titles use a number
0%
Typical length
32characters · about a sentence long
3060100

§08

When they hit publish

50 uploads
Day & time of release

Most videos drop on a Wednesday, usually in the morning.

Across the weekvideos per day
7
Mon
6
Tue
12
Wed
8
Thu
9
Fri
1
Sat
7
Sun
Wednesdays are the favorite. Roughly 24% of uploads land then.
Time of dayUTC hour
12am6amnoon6pm11pm
They publish most often in the morning. The busiest hour is around 9am UTC. Mornings and middays are mostly quiet.
late nightwhen most uploads happen
middaywhen uploads almost never happen
7 of 7days of the week saw an upload

§09

What to do with this

Not every tactic transfers. Here's the triage: what's safe to copy, what's stuck to this channel, and what looks great until it bites you.

Copy this

Likely to work for similar channels.

  • Directly challenging common misconceptions with clear, evidence-based explanations is a highly effective content strategy.
  • Using simple, household-item experiments to demonstrate scientific principles can make complex topics accessible and engaging.
  • Crafting titles as direct questions encourages audience engagement and signals a clear problem-solution narrative.
  • Incorporating street interviews can effectively highlight common misunderstandings and provide relatable entry points for viewers.

Won't transfer

Worked here, channel-specific.

  • The channel's early use of science-themed song parodies, like "I'm Atoms" and "Gravity," relies heavily on the creator's musical ability and specific niche appeal, which may not transfer to all science educators.
  • The creator's academic background and authority in science communication provided a strong foundation for debunking complex topics, a factor not easily replicated by all new creators.

Watch out

Worked, but carries risk.

  • Relying heavily on street interviews can be time-consuming and logistically challenging to sustain consistently.
  • Producing content that directly corrects widespread beliefs requires careful research and clear communication to avoid alienating viewers or spreading misinformation.

§10

Share this analysis

6 tweets · Veritasium

An X thread built from this phase's data. Numbers, the breakout, the lesson, and a link back. Copy as-is or edit first.

  1. You@yourhandlenow01/06

    I read Veritasium's first 50 videos with growth-playbook.xyz 📚 Here's what stood out 🧵

    89/280
  2. You@yourhandlenow02/06

    ✨ Foundational Science Debunking Veritasium's initial phase focused on debunking common science misconceptions through short, experiment-driven videos, establishing a foundation of scientific literacy content.

    210/280
  3. You@yourhandlenow03/06

    📊 The pace • 50 videos · Aug 2010 → Aug 2011 • a new upload every ~3 days • ~511k median views

    95/280
  4. You@yourhandlenow04/06

    🚀 The biggest hit: "Supercooled Water - Explained!" 3.1M views · 6× the typical This video broke out by offering both a demonstration and an explanation of a visually captivating and widely shared phenomenon (instant freezing water).

    236/280
  5. You@yourhandlenow05/06

    💡 If you'd copy one thing: Directly challenging common misconceptions with clear, evidence-based explanations is a highly effective content strategy.

    150/280
  6. You@yourhandlenow06/06

    Want this for any channel? Paste a YouTube URL → get the playbook in ~1 min 🚀 growth-playbook.xyz

    100/280